Categories
Written by bakar8900 in Uncategorized
Aug 14 th, 2021
The current research examined the recognized impact of parental and social force on people’ perceptions regarding cross-cultural and interfaith dating and wedding. The concerns of great interest had been: (1) What is the impact of parental attitudes towards interfaith and cross-cultural relationships? (2) just how do the individuals feel it impacts upon them? And finally, (3) Just how can the individuals predict they shall react to their children’s range of such relationships? Fifty-five college pupils with diverse backgrounds took part in this research. The findings suggest that most the individuals had been affected by the social pressure placed upon them. Furthermore, the individuals identified the previous generation as “racist”. Nonetheless, interestingly you will find signs of an attitude shift that is generational. Finally, the findings reveal that more than 80 percent associated with the individuals failed to wish to interfere inside their children’s partner selection. The rest of the 20 percent had been against interfaith and cross-cultural relationship and marriages.
This really is a preview of membership content, access via your organization.
Immediate access into the full article PDF.
Tax calculation shall be finalised during checkout.
Immediate on the web access to all the dilemmas from 2019. Subscription will auto renew yearly.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
It should be noted that relationship is generally speaking maybe perhaps maybe not appropriate within the Arab and Muslim community (among others) unless the couple’s intention would be to date solely (but, specific limitations may nevertheless apply, e.g., limiting intimate activities) along with the try to get married. More over, in some instances, the approval of this female’s daddy ( or any other significant male figure) is needed seriously to enable this relationship to transpire. This matter ended up being addressed through the assortment of the information so that you can respect individuals’ social traditions and observing that is religious.
Berger, C. R. (1979). Beyond initial discussion: Uncertainty, understanding, therefore the growth of social relationships. In H. Giles & R. St. Clair (Eds.), Language and psychology that is socialpp. 122–144). Oxford: Blackwell.
Berger, C. R. (2005). Interpersonal interaction: Theoretical perspectives, future leads. Journal of correspondence, 55(3), 415–447.
Binder, J., Zagefka, H., Brown, R., Funke, F., Kessler, T., Mummendey, A., et al. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? a test that is longitudinal of contact theory among bulk and minority teams in three countries in europe. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 843.
Boker, A. (2008). Kiryat Gat: Racist campaign against Bedouin guys dating Jewish ladies. nana10. Retrieved December 31, 2013, from http://news.nana10.co.il/Article/?ArticleID=563227.
Bost, S. (2010). Mulattas and mestizas: Representing mixed identities in the Americas, 1850–2000. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Changing information that is qualitative Thematic analysis and rule development. Nyc, NY: Sage.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using analysis that is thematic therapy. Qualitative analysis in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
Cila, J., & Lalonde, R. N. (2013). Private openness toward interfaith dating and wedding among Muslim teenagers: The part of religiosity, social identification, and household connectedness. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. doi:10.1177/1368430213502561.
Cohen, A. B. (2009). Numerous kinds of culture. US Psychologist, 64, 194–204.
Dion, K. K., & Dion, K. L. (1993). Individualistic and collectivistic views on sex additionally the context that is cultural of and intimacy. Journal of Social problems, 49, 53–59.
Driscoll, R., Davis, K. E., & Lipetz, M. E. (1972). Parental disturbance and intimate love: the Romeo and Juliet impact. Journal of Personality and Social Structure, 24, 1–10.
Eggert, L. L., & Parks, M. R. (1987). Correspondence community participation in adolescents’ friendships and relationships that are romantic. Correspondence Yearbook, 10, 283–322.
Espiritu, Y. L. (2001). “We don’t rest around like White girls do”: Family, tradition, and sex in Filipina American everyday lives. Indication, 26, 415–440.
Etcheverry, P. E., Le, B., & Hoffman, N. G. (2012). Predictors of buddy approval for intimate relationships. Personal Relationships, 4, 1–15.
Felmlee, D. (2003). Relationship in social networking sites. In J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of social therapy (pp. 389–409). Nyc: Plenum.
Felmlee, D., & Sprecher, S. (2000). Intimate lovers’ perceptions of social networking features because of the passing of some time relationship transitions. Personal Relationships, 7, 325–340.
Goetz, J., & LeCompte, M. (1984). Ethnography and design that is qualitative academic research. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Harris, T. M., & Kalbfleisch, P. J. (2000). Interracial dating: The implications of battle for starting a relationship that is romantic. Howard Journal of Communications, 11, 49–64.
Hollingshead, A. B. (1950). Social factors within the choice of wedding mates. United States Sociological Review, 15, 619–627.
Kalmijn, M. (1998). Intermarriage and homogamy: Reasons, patterns, styles. Yearly Report About Sociology, 395–421.
Lasson, K. (2008). Bloodstains for a Code of Honor: The marginalization that is murderous of in the Islamic World. Women’s Rights Law Reporter, 30, 407.
Lewis, R. (1973). Personal effect together with development of dyads: an approach that is interactionist mate selection. Sociometry, 34, 409–418.
Madek, C. A. (2005). Killing dishonor: Effective eradication of honor killing. Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 29, 53.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: helpful tips to create and implementation. London: Wiley.
Moore, R. M. (2000). An exploratory research of interracial dating on a college campus that is small. Sociological Viewpoints, 16, 46–64.
Parks, M. R., & Adelman, M. B. (1983). Correspondence sites in addition to growth of intimate relationships: An expansion of doubt decrease concept. Human Correspondence Analysis, 10, 55–79.
Parks, M. R., & Adelman, M. B. (1983). Correspondence companies plus the growth of romantic relationships: An expansion of doubt decrease concept. Human Correspondence Research, 10(1), 55–79.
Reich, W. A., Ramos, J. M., & Jaipal, R. (2000). Cultural identification and interethnic dating in Portuguese adults. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 153–161.
Sprecher, S. (1988). Investment model, equity, and support that is social of relationship commitment. Personal Psychology Quarterly, 51, 318–328.
Sprecher, S. (2011). The impact of internet sites on intimate relationships: Through the lens of this network that is social. Personal Relationships, 18(4), 630–644.
Telles, E. E., & Sue, C. A. (2009). Race combination: Boundary crossing in relative perspective. Sociology, 35(1), 129.
Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and ways of qualitative meeting studies. Ny: The Complimentary Press.
Yahya, S., Bekerman, Z., Sagy, S., & Boag, S. (2012). Whenever training satisfies conflict: Palestinian and Jewish–Israeli parental attitudes towards comfort marketing training. Journal of Peace Education, 9, 297–320.
Yahya https://besthookupwebsites.org/wantmatures-review/ S., & Boag S. (under review-a). Factors affecting attitudes towards cross-cultural and dating that is interfaith wedding. Marriage and Family Review.
Yahya S., & Boag S. (under review-b). “Sadly, not totally all love affairs are supposed to be…” Attitudes towards interfaith and cross-cultural relationship and marriages in a conflict-ridden area. Center East Journal.
comments(No Comments)
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Welcome to Shekhai!
If you have amazing skills, we have amazing StudyBit. Shekhai has opportunities for all types of fun and learning. Let's turn your knowledge into Big Bucks.
